|
Post by Maggie on Aug 27, 2013 11:08:57 GMT -6
Why do you say that?
|
|
|
Post by Woodrow LI on Aug 27, 2013 11:30:48 GMT -6
I don't see how "I believe only spirit (life force which will return to God) will survive the death of the body until resurrection." differs from the concept of the Soul. Seems like different wording for the same thing. The difference is that JWs believe that life force is an impersonal force and not something that is conscious. It's simply the "breath of life" that is shared by all creatures and there is nothing unique about it from individual to individual. A human body + breath of life = human soul. The soul is more than just the body, being the very representation of who we are, our thoughts, our dreams, etc., but it doesn't operate apart from a body. So essentially there is a reproduction instead of a resurrection. A new, edited updated version of the person is created, A new being built to be the deceased, containing no parts of the deceased.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 27, 2013 14:10:11 GMT -6
Because the earth is capable of producing plenty of food for everyone. The only reason people don't get enough is economics -- greed. So essentially there is a reproduction instead of a resurrection. A new, edited updated version of the person is created, A new being built to be the deceased, containing no parts of the deceased. No not quite. While the soul cannot operate without a body, the body is not itself the soul. Here God told Adam what would happen to him at death. "in the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return" -- Genesis 3:19. In similar manner Ecclesiastes says, "All go unto one place; all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again" -- Ecc 3:20. Adam did not exist before he was created from dust. After death he would return to that same state of dust. That is why Solomon said, "For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not anything" -- Ecc 9:5. It's why the psalmist said, "Consider and answer me, O Jehovah my God: Lighten mine eyes, lest I sleep the'sleep of death" -- Psalm 13:31. It's not the body that's resurrected, it's the soul that is resurrected, but without a body the soul is dead and unconscious. It will sleep in death until it is awakened by a resurrection. The same soul that died is the one that will be resurrected. JWs do believe however it will be the same body that died, although not necessarily made up of the exact same particles of dust. You're old body will be recreated and the same soul will live again. Of course those that are resurrected into heaven will not have flesh and blood bodies. They will have spiritual bodies so theirs will be new -- 1 Cor 15:35-54.
|
|
|
Post by questionmark on Aug 28, 2013 8:11:23 GMT -6
I find that kind of short sighted. What about those who do not have access to Bibles because it is deprived of them?
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Aug 28, 2013 9:14:38 GMT -6
That is what I believe, a resurrection of body and soul. Those resurrected to heaven will be given spiritual bodies and immediately become incorruptible and immortal, like Christ himself. This is not, however, Christian teaching and very hard to derive from the Biblical text. The body is not some mere add-on and it is not a drag. Without a body our senses are useless. Our bodies will be incorruptible and immortal. If the body was of limited use, Christ would not have come back in the body. He could have come back as a "ghost". He did not. He came back in a body that enabled him to eat and drink with his followers and walk with them. No ethereal floating noted!
We can know this because we have been told it. We cannot know what heaven will be like. We can guess but we can have no certainty. I do not see anything in scripture that suggests that there will be a hierarchy of believers and that some of us only make it to the 2nd tier with our bodies while others float off to some 1st tier heaven. Christians are promised that they will go to be with the Lord. Full stop. Moreover, Christ still has a body that bears the wounds he endured for our sake. As the old hymn has it-- "those wounds yet visible above; in beauty glorified".
Christianity is amazingly physical. It delights in food and drink, music, light, and all the rest. It was the Greeks whose philosophy separated body and soul and dismissed the body as crude matter, unworthy of attention. That is not the biblical picture.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 28, 2013 12:50:14 GMT -6
I find that kind of short sighted. What about those who do not have access to Bibles because it is deprived of them? They will all be resurrected upon the earth and given a chance to learn under Christ's rulership. Of their own free will they will either accept it or reject it. Maggie I'll get to your post in a bit.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 28, 2013 21:45:54 GMT -6
The body is not some mere add-on and it is not a drag. Without a body our senses are useless. I did not mean to present it as an add-on. It is not like some ghostly figure or anything like that. But the body is not itself the soul. That's why the Bible says God can destroy "both body and soul in gehenna". A soul is what we are. A soul doesn't inhabit our bodies, our bodies are part of that soul. But the soul also includes things like our thoughts, our memories, our love, our hate, our personality, etc. If God resurrected our bodies but didn't give us all these things back then we wouldn't be the same soul that died. Christians are promised that they will go to be with the Lord. Full stop. No I don't think it is a full stop. Yes there are promises of going to heaven. But there are also promises of an earthly inheritance and of the kingdom coming down and God dwelling "with mankind". I think a lot of believers take what the Bible says about the earthly kingdom and place it in heaven. For example, when Jesus told the criminal. "Truly I tell you today you will be with me in Paradise". A lot of Christians think that means that the criminal went to heaven on that day and where some Bible translations place a comma it seems to support this. There was no comma at all in the original. They read, "truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise". But if the Christian stops and asks a few questions he might derive at a different conclusion. Did Christ go to paradise that day? Where did Christ go that day? Didn't Christ go to hades for three days? Now I believe that means he was dead and unconscious for three days, but many Christians believe he was preaching to spirits in hell. Regardless, even after his resurrection Jesus told Mary Magddalene, "...I have not yet ascended to the father". (John 20:17) Clearly, Christ did not go to paradise that day. That is why some other translations insert the comma in a different place. "Truly I tell you today, you will be with me in Paradise." And where did God create paradise? He created it on this earth. Why would he create an earthlike paradise in heaven when he has the actual earth? The earth was created for man and man was created for the earth. He could have come back as a "ghost". He did not. He came back in a body that enabled him to eat and drink with his followers and walk with them. No ethereal floating noted! Okay stop and think for a moment. Have not angels come to earth in the past and become flesh and blood and reproduced with human? And after his resurrection there were times when he made unexplained appearances, or wasn't even recognized by his disciples, but that probably is better left to another thread on JW beliefs. But the important thing to remember is that Christ sacrificed more than his flesh and blood, he sacrifed a perfect human life to buy back what Adam lost, that is perfect human life. That is the law of justice, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, life for life. Adam didn't just lose a body, he lost perfect human life and a perfect human life was required to ransom it. Christ may visit the earth but I do not think he will ever live on the earth as a man. But on the other hand there are promises to Christians going to heaven and being "kings and priests" of God and promies of them ruling the earth. Many people ask what people in heaven will be doing. They will be ruling and serving as priests for God. But who will they be ruling and serving as priests to? It will be for the earth as Gods kingdom "comes down" to it, that is, it takes over full rulership of the earth through "princes". Basically the Church is going to be ruling the earth, if you will. Christ and some Christians with him serving as "kings and priests", and making up a heavenly "Israel of God" (Gal 6:16) will rule from heaven. And those that live in heaven will have heavenly bodies, whatever that may be like. Those on earth will have earthly bodies. Will they materialize and come to the earth? I like to think they will. Even God is said to have walked in Eden with Adam, likely through Christ. I don't see why a future paradise would be any different. However the throne of the kindom, belonging ultimately to God, is where God has his throne, in heaven. Christ will not sit on an earthly throne, that is what the Israelites also failed to understand, but he will rule the earth, exactly as was promised. They did not mistake the promise, they mistook the place for the seat of government and the type of rulership it would be. Christ said, "My kingdom is not from this source." The source is in heaven. "God is my throne" I believe is what the psalmist said.
|
|
|
Post by questionmark on Aug 29, 2013 8:35:05 GMT -6
JST, And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.
But I am hard-pressed from both directions, having the desire to depart and be with Christ, for that is very much better; yet to remain on in the flesh is more necessary for your sake. (Philippians 1:23-24)
Therefore, being always of good courage, and knowing that while we are at home in the body we are absent from the Lord--for we walk by faith, not by sight--we are of good courage, I say, and prefer rather to be absent from the body and to be at home with the Lord. Therefore we also have as our ambition, whether at home or absent, to be pleasing to Him. (2 Corinthians 5:6-9)
Paul believed that the believer goes to be with Christ in heaven. After that, during the resurrection of the dead, the believers will embody glorified forms.
This stuff is really, really clear, and the JW's don't have it right. They also don't have it right when they refuse to believe that Jesus is the LORD.
|
|
|
Post by Maggie on Aug 29, 2013 8:41:34 GMT -6
I agree with you, QM. I do think it would repay us to look at the scriptures more closely and think all this through. It is an important topic.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 29, 2013 14:38:05 GMT -6
And these will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous into eternal life. Here the word translated "punishment" literally means lopping off. Here the scripture is contrasting life and death. Concerning the rest of your post, all of the apostles had a heavenly calling. In order to be resurrected to heavenly life one must be released from the physical body and be given a heavenly body. But that has nothing to do with the condition of the dead. The Bible clearly shows that the body dies, the soul dies, and the life force returns to God. People will "sleep in death" until resurrection except for some that take part in the first resurection. Those will "not all sleep in death". Consider the resurrection of Lazarus. If Christ had resurrected him by removing him from heaven then Christ did no great service to Lazarus. However Christ did not say Lazarus was in heaven. He said he was "sleeping".
|
|
|
Post by questionmark on Aug 29, 2013 18:33:32 GMT -6
JST, The eternality of life is the same word as the eternality of the punishment. Yes it may mean lopping off (not looking at my greek at the moment) but that wouldn't change anything. Would you like to be lopped off over and over again for eternity? That's how Jesus spoke of the torment, the fire does not go out, the worm does not consume. Jehovah's Witnesses ENTIRELY ignore the passages that speak of the detailed torment the reprobate will experience. Please do not say they get their doctrine right!
The Bible does not clearly show that the soul dies. It shows nowhere that the soul dies. It also doesn't speak of a life force, it speaks of the breath of life also known as the spirit. It says some have fallen asleep but it says they are with the Lord in heaven, and he is obviously not asleep. It's called paradise. To us the dead are asleep, to the dead we are asleep (seeing as in a mirror darkly).
If I consider the death of Lazarus and speculate as you are then I find perfect agreement with Paul. It is better to be with the Lord than in the flesh. Jesus didn't resurrect Lazarus for the benefit of Lazarus, but rather for the testimony to the LORD's power over life and death and for the sorrow of his family. Whether his sleep was having actually died and being in heaven or a time of sleep before the person experiences his heaven is not stated. It is speculation. You are speculating to undo clear passages, that's the opposite of right interpretation. Use the clear to interpret the unclear.
|
|
|
Post by Woodrow LI on Aug 29, 2013 18:51:12 GMT -6
The body is not some mere add-on and it is not a drag. Without a body our senses are useless. I did not mean to present it as an add-on. It is not like some ghostly figure or anything like that. But the body is not itself the soul. That's why the Bible says God can destroy "both body and soul in gehenna". A soul is what we are. A soul doesn't inhabit our bodies, our bodies are part of that soul. But the soul also includes things like our thoughts, our memories, our love, our hate, our personality, etc. If God resurrected our bodies but didn't give us all these things back then we wouldn't be the same soul that died. This seems to be a contradiction. In the Title it says the immortal soul does not exist. But in the post you say it can be destroyed in gehenna. For something to be destroyed it has to exist.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 29, 2013 19:16:07 GMT -6
JST, The eternality of life is the same word as the eternality of the punishment. Yes it may mean lopping off (not looking at my greek at the moment) but that wouldn't change anything. Would you like to be lopped off over and over again for eternity? That's how Jesus spoke of the torment, the fire does not go out, the worm does not consume. Jehovah's Witnesses ENTIRELY ignore the passages that speak of the detailed torment the reprobate will experience. Please do not say they get their doctrine right! The Bible does not clearly show that the soul dies. It shows nowhere that the soul dies. It also doesn't speak of a life force, it speaks of the breath of life also known as the spirit. It says some have fallen asleep but it says they are with the Lord in heaven, and he is obviously not asleep. It's called paradise. To us the dead are asleep, to the dead we are asleep (seeing as in a mirror darkly). If I consider the death of Lazarus and speculate as you are then I find perfect agreement with Paul. It is better to be with the Lord than in the flesh. Jesus didn't resurrect Lazarus for the benefit of Lazarus, but rather for the testimony to the LORD's power over life and death and for the sorrow of his family. Whether his sleep was having actually died and being in heaven or a time of sleep before the person experiences his heaven is not stated. It is speculation. You are speculating to undo clear passages, that's the opposite of right interpretation. Use the clear to interpret the unclear. Mortal and destructible. On the other hand, Matthew 10:28 states that God “can destroy both soul [psy·khen′] and body in Gehenna.” This shows that psy·khe′ does not refer to something immortal or indestructible. There is, in fact, not one case in the entire Scriptures, Hebrew and Greek, in which the words ne′phesh or psy·khe′ are modified by terms such as immortal, indestructible, imperishable, deathless, or the like. (See IMMORTALITY; INCORRUPTION.) On the other hand, there are scores of texts in the Hebrew and Greek Scriptures that speak of the ne′phesh or psy·khe′ (soul) as mortal and subject to death (Ge 19:19, 20; Nu 23:10; Jos 2:13, 14; Jg 5:18; 16:16, 30; 1Ki 20:31, 32; Ps 22:29; Eze 18:4, 20; Mt 2:20; 26:38; Mr 3:4; Heb 10:39; Jas 5:20); as dying, being “cut off” or destroyed (Ge 17:14; Ex 12:15; Le 7:20; 23:29; Jos 10:28-39; Ps 78:50; Eze 13:19; 22:27; Ac 3:23; Re 8:9; 16:3), whether by sword (Jos 10:37; Eze 33:6) or by suffocation (Job 7:15), or being in danger of death due to drowning (Jon 2:5); and also as going down into the pit or into Sheol (Job 33:22; Ps 89:48) or being delivered therefrom (Ps 16:10; 30:3; 49:15; Pr 23:14). Dead soul. The expression ‘deceased or dead soul’ also appears a number of times, meaning simply “a dead person.”—Le 19:28; 21:1, 11; 22:4; Nu 5:2; 6:6; Hag 2:13; compare Nu 19:11, 13.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 29, 2013 19:16:59 GMT -6
I did not mean to present it as an add-on. It is not like some ghostly figure or anything like that. But the body is not itself the soul. That's why the Bible says God can destroy "both body and soul in gehenna". A soul is what we are. A soul doesn't inhabit our bodies, our bodies are part of that soul. But the soul also includes things like our thoughts, our memories, our love, our hate, our personality, etc. If God resurrected our bodies but didn't give us all these things back then we wouldn't be the same soul that died. This seems to be a contradiction. In the Title it says the immortal soul does not exist. But in the post you say it can be destroyed in gehenna. For something to be destroyed it has to exist Something that is immortal cannot be destroyed and does not die.
|
|
|
Post by Woodrow LI on Aug 29, 2013 19:34:24 GMT -6
This seems to be a contradiction. In the Title it says the immortal soul does not exist. But in the post you say it can be destroyed in gehenna. For something to be destroyed it has to exist Something that is immortal cannot be destroyed and does not die. Are the 144,000 in Heaven Immortal? Will those resurrected be immortal? If yes, to either question, than you are claiming they are more powerful than God(swt) because he can not destroy them.
|
|
|
Post by questionmark on Aug 30, 2013 0:09:26 GMT -6
JST, I think you're using the modern meaning of these words without considering the contextual and ancient meanings. When we look at nephesh or pschen we have to see how they were used in Scripture, not how we would use their English equivalents.
Jesus spoke of mortal beings being ETERNALLY tormented. So, clearly they are not undone, ended, annihilated, or consumed by the torment. It does not stop. So you can focus on the word or you can focus on how Jesus defined the words. But, the kingdom of God is not a matter of words. We don't worship the LORD Jesus because of the letters L O R D J E S U S. I worship the living LORD JESUS. Not the letters but what they refer to. The Scripture is not dead! It speaks of reality, what is true.
The truth is that Jesus is now in heaven, that those elect who die go to be with him in heaven, yet they do not have the body of the final resurrection. They are disembodied. They will eventually be embodied, as all souls will eventually be embodied to experience (in the risen body) eternal torment or eternal glory.
God can destroy the soul in hell, but this destruction is not one of annihilation. Remember the burning bush that was not consumed? Everyone knows that a bush is destructible, yet the bush was not even consumed by fire! So don't reply saying 'the soul is destructible'. Yes, of course it is destructible, that doesn't mean it ceases to exist! On the contrary, a soul NEVER ceases to exist. The souls called Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are alive right now. You may call them asleep if you wish, but they are alive. But, what does it mean to be asleep? Clearly it does not mean that you cease to exist, or cease to experience, otherwise we would not have the word dream. To be asleep is not to be unconscious definitively, it's to be unconscious of the one who says the sleeper is sleeping.
The dead are asleep to us. They are not asleep to themselves.
The soul can be destroyed, but it is destroyed without consumption.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 30, 2013 14:05:34 GMT -6
Something that is immortal cannot be destroyed and does not die. Are the 144,000 in Heaven Immortal? Will those resurrected be immortal? If yes, to either question, than you are claiming they are more powerful than God(swt) because he can not destroy them. Yes, Christ and those with him will be immortal. But no that does not make them more powerful than God because he is the one that grants them immortality. And it's not so much he lacks the power to destroy them so much as it means he would never have the moral right to do so because he has granted them incorruptibility, meaning it is impossible for them to sin therefore God cannot destroy them in the same way that God cannot lie. This sets them even above the angels as they are not immortal and some will die when they are cast into the lake of fire. This means second death, the lake of fire. And those resurrected on the earth will not be immortal but they will have everylasting life. For all intents an puposes it's the same thing as far as I can tell, but just like Adam's survival depended on eating of the Tree of Life so will those those be that are resurrected on the earth be dependant up something similar. The distinction to me is blurry, but those in heaven will possess immortality in a way that those on earth will not. The Bible shows that after the end of the 1000 years when Satan is let loose for a while that he will again mislead many upon the earth. However he will not be able to mislead any that are in heaven because they are incorruptible. After the 1000 years I have no reason to believe that any humans will ever die. But like I said the distinction is rather blurry to me. I think what it is is that those on earth can theoretically sin although they never will, those that survive Satan's final test, whereas those in heaven cannot sin. That is why only those on earth are mislead at the end of the 1000 years. But they will in no way be more powerful than Jehovah or even equal. After the 1000 years and after Satan's final test Christ hands the kingdom over to his father who will be all and in all.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 30, 2013 16:09:06 GMT -6
JST, I think you're using the modern meaning of these words without considering the contextual and ancient meanings. When we look at nephesh or pschen we have to see how they were used in Scripture, not how we would use their English equivalents. What I hear you saying is that when the Bible says dead, it doesn't really mean dead. Dead really means eternal life in torment. The wages of sin is not death, it's eternal life in torment. So death is symbollic. Is that what you're saying? And when God told Adam "you will die" he really meant he would have eternal life in torment and when Satan told Eve, "you surely shall not die" what he really meant was she would not have eternal life in torment? I mean it really seems to me that anyone that says, "you surely will not die" is repeating the same words of Satan to Eve. To me it's like people say, "well whatever might happen one thing is for sure. You surely will not die." However, God said, "you will surely die". So what I think is different here is that you view death as symbolic while I view hell fire as symbolic. But if deat is symbolic and hell fire is real then how do you explain this scripture? "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death." (Revelation: 20:14) Now is second death symbolic of the lake of fire or is the lake of fire symbolic of second death? Death and hell cannot be burned in fire, however they can be destroyed, which would make the lake of fire a symbol of destruction. Also, if death is symbolic of eternal torment how can death ever be defeated as the Bible says it will?
|
|
|
Post by Woodrow LI on Aug 30, 2013 16:13:29 GMT -6
Are the 144,000 in Heaven Immortal? Will those resurrected be immortal? If yes, to either question, than you are claiming they are more powerful than God(swt) because he can not destroy them. Yes, Christ and those with him will be immortal. But no that does not make them more powerful than God because he is the one that grants them immortality. And it's not so much he lacks the power to destroy them so much as it means he would never have the moral right to do so because he has granted them incorruptibility, meaning it is impossible for them to sin therefore God cannot destroy them in the same way that God cannot lie. This sets them even above the angels as they are not immortal and some will die when they are cast into the lake of fire. This means second death, the lake of fire. And those resurrected on the earth will not be immortal but they will have everylasting life. For all intents an puposes it's the same thing as far as I can tell, but just like Adam's survival depended on eating of the Tree of Life so will those those be that are resurrected on the earth be dependant up something similar. The distinction to me is blurry, but those in heaven will possess immortality in a way that those on earth will not. The Bible shows that after the end of the 1000 years when Satan is let loose for a while that he will again mislead many upon the earth. However he will not be able to mislead any that are in heaven because they are incorruptible. After the 1000 years I have no reason to believe that any humans will ever die. But like I said the distinction is rather blurry to me. I think what it is is that those on earth can theoretically sin although they never will, those that survive Satan's final test, whereas those in heaven cannot sin. That is why only those on earth are mislead at the end of the 1000 years. But they will in no way be more powerful than Jehovah or even equal. After the 1000 years and after Satan's final test Christ hands the kingdom over to his father who will be all and in all. The question is not if He would ever destroy the 144,000. The question is does he have the ability to destroy them. If he does not have the ability to, they are more powerful than him.
|
|
|
Post by jstwebbrowsing on Aug 30, 2013 16:21:47 GMT -6
There is nothing that Jehovah cannot do, but to me that question presents a paradox similar to asking if God can create a rock so big he can't pick it up? Can God create something he cannot destroy? Both questions are a paradox.
|
|